Wednesday, February 17, 2021

Feria Quarta Cinerum (Ash Wednesday) to Begin Quadragesima Paschae (Lent for Resurrection)

 Lent, as defined by the Council of Trent in 325, is quadragesima paschae. It means 40 days (quadragesima) to prepare for the feast of the Resurrection of Christ (paschae). 

These 40 days of Lent are punctuated with 6 Sundays, as these Sundays are like rest and water stations on a marathon course, as Lent is a transcendentally transformative journey juxtaposable to a marathon. A marathon that comes with “θλίψεσιν /thlipsesin”(challenges)  and, therefore, demands “ὑπομονῇ/hypomone”(perseverance) in order for us to build “δοκιμὴ/dokime” (character) and “ἐλπὶς οὐ καταισχύνει/elpis ou kataischynei”(hope that does not disappoint), and we can complete this “Lenten marathon” because God has poured out His love through the Holy Spirit ( ὅτι ἡ ἀγάπη τοῦ Θεοῦ ἐκκέχυται ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις ἡμῶν διὰ Πνεύματος Ἁγίου), as Paul has put it in Romans 5:3-5. So, we begin our Lenten journey of 40 days with 6 Sundays on Ash Wednesday (Feria Quarta Cinerum, which literally means “feast of ashes on the fourth day of week)  and complete this journey of transcendental transformation when we begin Paschal Triduum after sundown on Maundy Thursday.

First, why ashes to be put in beginning our Lenten 40 days journey?

It reflects a punch line verse from the First Reading (Joel 2:12-18), “Return to me with your whole heart with fasting, weeping, and mourning” (Joel 2:12). And reflect this on Daniel 9:3, “I turned to the Lord God, to seek help, in prayer and petition, with fasting, sackcloth, and ashes”.  Not just ashes but fasting and prayer are signs of penance, which prompts us to turn to God for His mercy to transform us.

So, we pray for God’s mercy to be cleansed of sins’ dirt, symbolized with ashes, to be transformed and transcended anew, as reflected on the Responsorial Psalm (Psalm 51:3-4, 5-6ab, 12-13, 14 and 17), echoing Joel 2:12-13 (cf. Daniel 9:18-19).

Though the First Reading for Ash Wednesday is Joel 2:12-18, for better understanding of Lent and why the passage from Joel is chosen to begin Lent on Ash Wednesday, I encourage you to read Joel 1:1-2:32. Then you can see why Joel called Judah to return to God with all their heart. It is even better to read Daniel 9 for a deeper hermeneutic appreciation to Joel 1-2, to recognize how prophetic calls urged the Israelites to turn away from their sinful ways to turn back to God when God’s judgement with disastrous effects was at hand.

Judah was subject to God’s judgement for their sins. Though the day of the Lord (the day of judgement) was coming, as reminded by the trumpet, Joel also reminded Judah that God’s mercy was not turned off from them – if they seek His mercy with contrite hearts, God will bless them.  And one of the blessings to come is Pentecost (Joel 2:28).  So, if you read the entire chapter 1-2 of the Book of Joel, then, you can get an overview from Ash Wednesday to Pentecost.

In repenting, once we turn away from a life of sin, which leads us to destruction, and turn back to God, who is abounding in love and full of mercy, for reconciliation and healing toward restoration of the original fullness, what are we to do?

Answer is found in the Gospel Reading (Matthew 6: 1-6, 16-18): almsgiving (vv, 1-4), prayer (vv. 5-6), and fasting (vv. 16-18). These are three pillar Lenten virtues. In the Gospel Reading, Jesus warns us that we commit ourselves to these three Lenten virtues of prayer, fasting, and almsgiving, never to draw public attention to ourselves but rather to keep the matter in secret. Basically, our Lenten commitment to prayer, fasting, and almsgiving is not meant to be publically acknowledged but rather to be anonymous – to be recognized only by God.

We want to be recognized by others for doing right things. So, we want others to know how we are committed to Lenten prayer, fasting, and almsgiving. But, our desire for this recognition may easily bring us back to the state of sin. Thus, ultimately, we need to really work hard to overcome our egocentric gravity as we engage in and commit to the Lenten virtues of prayer, fasting, and almsgiving. Otherwise, our Lenten journey would be in vain.

So, how can we overcome our tendency to draw attention to ourselves as we pray, fast, and give alms?

We may find wisdom for this in Second Reading (2 Corinthians 5:20 - 6:2).

In this Second Reading, Paul reminds us that we are ambassadors of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:20; cf 6:1) . We are, indeed, Christ’s ambassadors to each other. Therefore, we need to encourage each other to return to God together and not to slip back to sins, resisting our egocentric gravity as we pray, fast, and give alms.

Helping each other as ambassadors of Christ, overcoming egocentric forces to draw attention to ourselves, we can make sure that our Lenten commitment of prayer, fasting, and almsgiving, are not in vain but really transformative and transcendental. It also means that we are not receiving God’s mercy in vain .

Paul reminds us that now is the time of God’s special grace for salvation (2 Corinthians 6:2). It is now, Ash Wednesday, to receive God’s special grace of mercy through our wholehearted. There is no other better time than now to be transformed through conversion. And Ash Wednesday is the gateway entry into the 40 days Lenten journey of transcendental transformation to celebrate paschae – the Resurrection of Christ, as we are heading to crucify our egos with Christ on the Cross and rise with the Risen Christ living in us, as Paul puts in Galatians 2:20. And this is an effect of our Lenten transcendental transformation.

Saturday, February 13, 2021

Agape-Driven Deeper Compassion and Mighty Healing Hand of Jesus for Our Deep Cleansing: 5th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle B

 After Advent Season to prepare for the coming of the incarnated Christ as baby Jesus, we have celebrated the unfolding mystery of the incarnation of Christ throughout Christmas Season, which concluded in celebrating the Baptism of the Lord, which signals the beginning of Jesus’ public ministry. Following the feast Sunday of the Baptism of the Lord, Ordinary Time started to journey with Jesus on his public ministry path. So far, we have reflected how Jesus met and called the first batch of his disciples and how they responded (John 1:35-42; Mark 1:14-20), how Jesus began his ministry with authority and how people reacted to it (Mark 1:21-28). Then, we have reflected how Jesus healed the sick and how people reacted to him (Mark 1:29-39). Now, we reflect one more episode of Jesus’ healing ministry on this Sunday before Ash Wednesday.

This year, year 2021, which is on Cycle B, the Sunday  before Ash Wednesday is the 6th Sunday in Ordinary Time, and the Gospel Reading (Mark 1:40-45) reflects how Jesus healed a leper and consequences of Jesus’ healing of the leper.

There have been many diseases. However, leprosy stood out during the time of the Old Testament. As we can see from the First Reading (Leviticus 13:1-2, 44-46), leprosy was associated with uncleanliness, thus, subjecting lepers to isolation (Leviticus 13:4, 21,26, 31, 33, 46) and to the purification ritual (Leviticus 14:1-20). Because of its visibly observable symptoms on the skin, such as whitened scales resembling a fungal infestation, it gave an impression that lepers were unhygienic and “dirty”. However, visible marks of this disease on the skin were not be able to washed off, and the leprosy goes under the skin to bring progressively debilitating symptoms by affecting nerves, muscles, and more, while deforming skins into boil-like growth.

The fact that it was a priest , not a physician, to declare whether a person with a scab or pustule or blotch is leprously unclean or not, indicates that leprosy is a physical manifestation of “unclean spiritual pathology” possibly associated with sin during the time of the Old Testament. Perhaps, attributing leprosy to sin is rooted in the fact that Miriam was afflicted with leprosy as a punishment and kept in 7-day isolation for her sin of rebelling against her brother, Moses, (Numbers 12:10-15).

Whether they actually sinned or not, those who were declared “unclean” by a priest for their leprous skin symptoms were not only left in physical isolation but more in humiliation and even as if being condemned. However, it is important to understand that a priest was also required by the Law of Moses not only to “diagnose” and declare whether unclean or clean on a person with leprous skin symptoms but actually to cleanse those who have been declared unclean (Leviticus 14:1-32). Therefore, lepers were not necessarily “sentenced” into condemnation but God has commanded a priest to bring them back through the ritual of cleansing as prescribed in Leviticus 14.

As the old covenant of the Old Testament was being fulfilled and renewed by Jesus’ public ministry upon John the Baptist’s preparatory ministry of repentance, cleansing, and conversion (Mark 1:14-15) , lepers were no longer necessarily required to go through the cleansing ritual by a priest as prescribed in Leviticus 14. It is because Jesus is the great high priest of compassion (Hebrews 4:14-16) of eternity (Hebrew 5:6; 7:14-17; Psalm 110:4). The Gospel Reading (Mark 1:40-45) gives a snap shot of how this eternal great high priest acts with his compassion on a leper’s request.

As Jesus successfully conducted exorcism on the spot to the demon-possessed man while teaching in the synagogue (Mark 1:23-28), healed Simon’s mother-in-law and more (Mark 1:29-34), the reputation of Jesus as a great healer had already widely spread throughout Galilee (Mark 1:28, 33,37) by the time when a leper came to Jesus, begging him to be cleaned (Mark 1:40). This leper was not made clean by a Temple priest of the old covenant. But, hearing the reputation of Jesus, he hoped to be made clean by this healer authority.

Jesus did not tell the leper, “Sorry, you need to have an appoint so that I could prepare two live, clean birds, some cedar wood, scarlet yarn, and hyssop, as required by the Law (Leviticus 14:4) to offer cleansing you desire. So, come back later”, as a priest of the old covenant might have told.  Jesus rather immediately responded to the leper’s request to be made clean out of his compassion (σπλάγχνα/ splagchnon)(Mark 1:41).

Driven by σπλάγχνα/ splagchnon (deep visceral compassion), Jesus has extended (ἐκτείνας / ekteinas ) his hand (χεῖρα/cheira) and touched (ἥψατο/ hepsato) and said “Θέλω /Thelo; καθαρίσθητι /katharistheti”(I am willing to do it; be made clean/cleansed) (Mark 1:41). This verse is pivotal as it tells who Jesus really is as the great eternal high priest of compassion.



As a result of Jesus’ willing act of σπλάγχνα/ splagchnon (deep visceral compassion ),  the leper was made clean instantly (Mark 1:42).  And, it is because of Jesus’ ἀγάπη/agape , on which the Father’s חֶסֶד/chesed (faithful steadfast love beyond love) and רַחֲמִים/rachamim (motherly compassion), as He is אֵל מָלֵא רַחֲמִים /El Malei Rachamim (God full of mercy).

What a mighty hand of healing that Jesus has! How deeply moving his compassion is! And he is our great eternal compassionate high priest!

Upon completely healing the leper on the spot immediately, Jesus warned him not to tell anyone about it but only to show himself his priest so that he can be declared clean (Mark 1:44) so that it would make as if his priest had cleansed him based on Leviticus 14:2–32.

Why did Jesus say such a warning to him?

To answer, we need to understand what Jesus was thinking in Mark 1:37-38, when his disciples were telling him that everyone in the town was looking for him but he said to leave the town and go around other towns to continue on with his public ministry.

Jesus told his disciples not to stay in a town where his popularity grew and go to places where he was not known yet. Why?

It is because Jesus was not performing healing and teaching with authority to magnet public attention for himself but solely for the sake of the one who sent him, namely the Father. Jesus represents אֵל מָלֵא רַחֲמִים /El Malei Rachamim (God full of mercy), and he himself is God incarnate (John 1:1, 14).  To bring and make God’s mercy readily available to the afflicted, including those who have been declared “unclean”, the Father has sent His only begotten Son, by incarnating him to dwell among us (John 1:14). That is why Jesus said, “For this purpose have I come” (Mark 1:38) in regard to his willingness to continue on with his teaching and healing with authority. However, rapid growth of his reputation made it difficult for Jesus to continue on with his mission – his public ministry as in the Father’s will. To minimize this problem, Jesus had to warn the man not to tell anyone about what he did to the man.

So, did this man honored Jesus’ request to keep the matter secret?

No. He spread the matter. As a result, it became difficult for Jesus to continue with his public ministry. So, he had to retreat himself to rather a deserted place (Mark 1:45).  Had Jesus been a man with self-glorification desire, like some popularity-hungry preachers and healers, he would remain where he had become popular and enjoyed the shower of praises to him. But, it was not the case with Jesus. So, he had to leave such a place.

During this prolonging covid-19 pandemic, we have been with heightened awareness of hygiene to prevent the spread of the infection. Now frequent hand-washing and wiping with disinfectant have become rather a routine daily ritual. Doing this ritual sure offers a psychological effect of “cleanliness”, making us “safer” against the infection. But, what about the cleanliness that matters most, without underestimating the seriousness of the pandemic?

Washing hands and wiping with disinfectant daily ritual is certainly important. But, in regard to the importance of our inner cleanliness, the purity of our hearts and souls, such routines as hand washing and wiping are more like washing off external uncleanliness juxtaposed to the ritual cleansing of the lepers (Leviticus 14). Given the real pathophysiology of leprosy, the cleansing methods in Leviticus 14 cannot really heal or cure the disease. Responsible bacteria (Mycobacterium leprae ) go deeper under the skin to further affect the muscle tissues and nerves and more with progressively debilitating effects. Thus, the disease cannot be “washed off”.  But, its unhygienic visible symptoms on the skin were immediately cleansed and leprosy was completely healed no matter how deep under the skin it had afflicted by the deeper compassion of Jesus through his mighty healing hand.

Now, Lent is around the corner, as Ash Wednesday is this Wednesday, with today’s readings, let us further reflect on our needs for deeper cleansing of “psychospiritual leprosy” which plagues bot our hearts and soul progressively, if untreated. Though its symptom may not be recognized visibly by others, its pathology can manifest in our verbal and nonverbal behaviors and in our relationship with God, as well as, in our interpersonal relationships. If you feel being away from God and/or away from people regardless of the pandemic-related social distancing, you may be infected with “psychospiritual leprosy” or similar psychospiritual illnesses. And the only effective way to be cleansed and healed from this problem is Jesus the incarnated Christ, our great compassionate eternal high priest. And he is the great physician who comes to heal those who have been afflicted with sins (Mark 2:17). And, he reminds us that a root of all of our psychospiritual pathologies can be found in our inner-self (Mark 7:20-23). And this is where we need his nighty healing hand with deeper compassion. So, Lent is a good time to let our great eternal high priest and physician, Jesus the incarnated Christ, touch and cleanse our innermost part so that we can crucify our sinful selves with him and rise with him within us (Galatians 2:20) during the paschal triduum.

As we begin the 40-day long Lenten journey of penance and cleansing, we are reminded of our “psychospiritual leprosy” and/or similar psychological and spiritual afflictions to be cleansed by the mighty hand of Jesus, our great eternal high priest and physician with deeper compassion. So, let us turn ourselves to him, as reflected in this refrain of the Responsorial Psalm (32:1-2, 5, 11 ),” I turn to you, Lord, in time of trouble, and you fill me with the joy of salvation”.

Paul had crucified his sinful self with Jesus and has had the risen Christ in him (Galatians 2:20). With cleansed heart and soul, he has been calling us to follow his experience, as he had followed Christ to his Cross. Therefore, he is calling us to be imitators of Christ as he has been (1 Corinthians 11:1), so that we can become selfless and act for others (1 Corinthians 10:33), in the spirit of these words of Fr. Pedro Arrupe SJ, “Hombres para los demas”(Men (and women) for others). And with this cleansed state of our hearts and souls, everything we do is for the glory of God (1 Corinthians 10:30) and as St. Ignatius of Loyola has said, “Ad majorem Dei gloriam”(for the greater glory of God).

As we are truly cleansed deeply by the mighty healing hand of Jesus, who is our great eternal high priest and physician with deeper compassion, our “psychospiritual leprosy” is cleansed and live anew as selfless persons for the greater glory of God, as Jesus himself lived in such a way and as Paul followed his this way of selfless ministry for us.

Friday, February 12, 2021

The Seventh Water Jar at Cana and Our Lady of Lourdes and St. Bernadette Soubirous

On February 11, the Roman Catholic Church honors Mary as Our Lady of Lourdes in the form of optional memorial feast. It is because February 11, 1858, was the first in the series of Marian apparitions, totaling 18 times, until July 16 of that year, in Lourdes, France. The apparitions were made solely to Bernadette Soubirous, then 14-year-old peasant girl, who was later canonized on the feast day of the Immaculate Conception (December 8), 1933.

So, what is the significance of this series of Marian apparitions to St. Bernadette, from February 11 to July 16, 1858, in Lourdes?

Speaking of Lourdes, what comes to our mind first is the medically verified healing effects of the spring water in Lourdes. But, did Mary appear 18 times to St. Bernadette to bring up the spring of healing water? The Marian apparitions to Bernadette cannot be reduced to the spring. In fact, Mary appeared to her to call for conversion of our hearts from sinfulness to purity through penance. And, to remind this, she also expressed her desire to build her shrine. Mary chose St. Bernadette to serve her for this purpose. Therefore, we must understand the significance of the spring of Lourdes in the context of our need of conversion for the purity of hearts. The emerging of the spring of the healing water in Lourdes is meant for cleansing ourselves for purity by washing off our sinfulness to be drawn closer to God for those who are humble enough to submit themselves to God’s care (James 4:6-8; cf. 2 Chronicles 7:14). And, St. Bernadette, for her humility, is a good example for this. So, Mary told Bernadette, “Drink from the fountain and bathe in it”, upon pointing her attention to the ground where the spring to be found underneath. And, Bernadette said to those who came to the spring, “One must have faith, one must pray: this water would have no virtue without faith!”, emphasizing the importance of faith, reflecting Jesus’ words on faith and healing (i.e. Mark 5:34; 10:52; Luke 7:50).

This year (the year 2021), amidst of the covid-19 pandemic, the memorial feast of Our Lady of Lourdes, which is also the World Day of the Sick, falls on Thursday of the week of the 4th Sunday in Ordinary Time on Cycle B.

The Gospel Reading for the 4th Sunday in Ordinary Time, B, (Mark 1:29-39) is about Jesus’ healing not only Simon (Peter)’s mother-in-law but many in the town of Capernaum. And the Gospel Reading for the 5th Sunday (Mark 1:40-45) depicts how Jesus healed a leper. So, this year (2021, Cycle B), the feast of Our Lady of Lourdes, as well as, the World Day of the Sick, is observed between Sundays with the Gospel readings on Jesus’ healing ministry.

In reflecting the First Reading (Isaiah 66:10-14c) and the Gospel Reading (John 2:1-11), a common theme across these readings is water. In the first reading, it is the flowing water in the river of peace (Isaiah 66:12), while it is the water in six jars to be turned into wine at the wedding reception (John 2:6-10). While the stream of peace (Isaiah 66:12) may point to the stream in Ezekiel 47:1 and Zechariah 14:18 in the context of the post-exilic restoration of Jerusalem, it may further lead to the stream in the ultimate New Jerusalem upon the consummation of Christ’s mission at the eschaton (Revelation 7:17; 22:1) in the context of the new creation and the completion of the Kingdom of God. Then, what leads us to benefit from the river steaming the water of life from Christ and his throne in the New Jerusalem (Revelation 22:1), the capitol of his Kingdom is the water that Christ gives. Remember, Christ is the reservoir of life-giving water (John 4:14; 7:38), and the water of life flows from Christ is also the Holy Spirit upon his glorification through his Resurrection and Ascension (John 7:38). The motif of Jesus the Christ as the source of this life-giving water is discerned from the Gospel Reading (John 2:1-11).

The Gospel Reading for the optional memorial feast of Our Lady of Lourdes (John 2:1-11) calls us remember that Mary would not have been known as Our Lady of Lourdes unless her Son, Jesus, were not Christ, the Son of the Most High – unless he was the 7th water jar.

Jesus, the 7th jar? What does it mean? – you may ask. And why seven?, you may ask.

First, allow me to explain why seven – why there had to be 7 water jars, though there were only 6 jars written in the Gospel Reading (John 2:1-11).

To simply put, the number 7 has a symbolic indication for completion, as well as, completeness, in the Jewish thinking. Perhaps, this concept reflects God’ blessing of the completion of His Creation on the 7th day as Sabbath (Genesis 2:1-3). So, John describes seven miraculous signs that Jesus performed in his Gospel: Transforming  water into wine at the marriage banquet  in Cana (2:1-11); Healing the royal official’s son in Capernaum (4:46-54) ; Healing of a disabled man at the Bethesda pool in Jerusalem (5:1-18); Feeding the five thousand our of two five loaves of bread and two fish by the Sea of Galilee (6:1-15); Walking on the surface water of the Sea of Galilee (6:16-21); Healing the man born blind in Jerusalem  (9:1-41); Raising Lazarus from the dead in Bethany (11:1-44).

In the Gospel Reading (John 2:1-11), which is a well-known narrative of the first sign out of the seven that Jesus performed during the wedding banquet at Cana. And, there were 6 stone jars to hold the water for ceremonial cleansing.

While the ceremonial banquet was in progress, Mary noticed that the wine being served for the quests just ran out and told her Son, Jesus, about it (John 2:3). At first, he seemed to have felt that it was not time yet for him to perform a sign (John 2:4), Jesus nevertheless affirmatively responded to his mother’s concern for the wine being served at the ceremony.

To prevent the disruption of the flow of serving wine for the wedding banquet at Cana, Jesus commanded the servers to fill the 6 water jars to the brim and turn the water in these jars into a fresh batch of fine wine by the time a sample drawn from one of the jars was presented to the master of the banquet (John 2:6-9). The quality of the new wine transformed out of the ceremonial cleansing water was much superior to the wine that was served and ran out (John 2:10).

When the flow of regular wine ran out, the fresh superior wine began to flow to continue the celebration of the consummation of the wedding. Therefore, the wedding ceremony was saved from a disruption and embarrassment thanks to Jesus performing the first miraculous sign (John 2:11) and thanks to Mary pointing the matter to her Son’s attention (John 2:3).

So, what about the 7th jar? Where was it?

Though it is not written in the Gospel Reading (John 2:1-11), the 7th jar was not missing at the wedding banquet. It existed there. But, it was not a stone jar like other 6 that were used to save the banquet. The 7th jar was made with human flesh of Jesus, the incarnated Christ, the Theos-Logos incarnate (John 1:1, 14), sitting at the banquet together with his mother, Mary, and his disciples, as invited guests.  The 7th jar, Jesus, was not used at the time of the wedding banquet, except for commanding the servants to use the 6 jars to save the banquet, at the suggestion of his mother, Mary.

Saving the wedding consummation banquet by using 6 jars of ceremonial cleansing water, turning it into the choicest wine, is a prefiguration to the use of the 7th jar, to be broken on the Cross. Upon crucifixion, the blood and the water gushed from the body of Jesus the Christ on the Cross for our salvation (John 19:34; Exodus 12:3-13; Revelation 7:9-17; cf. Diary of St. Faustina, 299) and to make us worthy to be his spouse at the eschaton (Revelation 19:6-9). The 7th jar, the source of the salvific blood of the Lamb of God with water, was saved until the day of Crucifixion for the 8th sign, to which all the 7 signs that Jesus performed (John 2:1-11; 4:46-54; 5:1-15; 6:5-14; 6:16-24; 9:1-7; 11:1-45) were leading. And, ultimately, the use of the 7th jar is to save the wedding of Christ the Lamb of God to us. That is why it was not used at the wedding in Cana.

As this 7th jar was already broken open on the Cross, the salvific blood and water have been gushing and continue to flow from the body of Jesus the Christ, even today and until parousia, through the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist, upon transubstantiation of wine mixed with water, at Mass, in light of Jesus’ words at the Last Supper in Matthew 26:27-29. Because of the salvific water mixed with the blood flowing from the 7th jar, in the form of consecrated wine mixed with water at Mass, the water flowing from the spring of Lourdes can give us not only cleansing effect but healing effect, as well, to those who are faithful and humble.

Now, we can see and appreciate the water flowing out of the spring in Lourdes in connection to the river of life (Revelation 22:1-2) in juxtaposition to the river of peace (Isaiah 66:16), because of the 7th jar, the limitless reservoir of the salvific wine mixed with water, transubstantiated into the very blood and water flowing from the body of Christ on the Cross.

Remember, Mary continues to work with her Son, Jesus the Christ, who has been incarnated through her unblemished flesh, for she is the Immaculate Conception.  The spring of Lourdes, which was brought up for our salvific benefits by Mary, as Our Lady of Lourdes, through St. Bernadette Soubirous, shall lead our attention to the 7th water jar present with Mary during the wedding banquet in Cana, because this jar is the incarnated Christ with his mother, Mary, is the unlimited source of the salvific water and blood, lead us to the river of life in the Kingdom. And, St. Bernadette offered herself with her redemptive suffering as guided by Mary, the mother of Christ, Our Lady of Lourdes, for us to eventually be benefitted from the river of life in the Kingdom. After all, it is all in God's will as Mary remains absolutely obedient to God as His handmaid (Luke 1:38).



demonstrated her redemptive suffering




Saturday, February 6, 2021

For This Purpose Have I come - Jesus' Mission in Progress: Healing in response to the Problem of Suffering (5th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle B)

 Praise the Lord, who heals the brokenhearted” (Psalm 147:3), “is the refrain from the Responsorial Psalm in celebrating the 5th Sunday in Ordinary Time on Cycle. And this refrain is drawn from:

How good to sing praise to our God; how pleasant to give fitting praise. The Lord rebuilds Jerusalem, and gathers the dispersed of Israel, healing the brokenhearted, and binding up their wounds (Psalm 147:1-3).

So, this Sunday (5th Sunday in Ordinary Time, B), we see God as the healer, who restore what is broken. For this, the Scripture readings address God’s healing in response to the problem of suffering – brokenness.

This Sunday’s Responsorial Psalm refrain, “Praise the Lord, who heals the brokenhearted” (Psalm 147:3) nicely follows the Responsorial Psalm refrain from last Sunday (4th Sunday in Ordinary Time, B): “If today you hear His voice, harden not your hearts”(Psalm 95:7-8).

God heals us, mending our brokenness, keeping our hearts from becoming hardened to be broken through his dabar (Word out of His mouth).

Through the flesh of Mary the Immaculate Conception and by the power of God the Holy Spirit (Matthew 1:18; Luke 1:35), the Word has been incarnated Christ the Son in the human flesh of Jesus (John 1:1, 14), the Word in the flesh of Jesus can speak but also touch us to bring healing and keeping our hearts from becoming hardened.

For the 5th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle B, the Scripture readings address the problem of suffering in humanity and healing through Christ, the Word-God incarnate.

Basically, the Gospel Reading for the 5th Sunday (Mark 1:29-39) focuses on Jesus’ healing ministry, immediately following the Gospel Reading of the 4th Sunday (Mark 1:21-28).

Jesus had a busy Sabbath day, preaching and exorcising in the synagogue (as we remember from the last Sunday’s Gospel Reading – Mark 1:21-28), then, healing Peter’s mother-in-law later on the day. She was immediately relieved from fever and healed as Jesus touched her and helped her up. Then, as soon as she was healed by Jesus, Peter’s mother-in-law served Sabbath dinner for Jesus and his disciples.

When Sabbath was over upon sundown of that day, people of the village brought those who were in need of healing  - those who were sick and possessed. Jesus cured many of them and drove out demons, not allowing them to speak as they knew who Jesus was.

Jesus was up before anyone else next morning and spent solid time with the Father alone in prayer in a deserted place – free from distraction.

Then, Simon and other disciples (Andrew, James, and John) pursued him there and told Jesus, “Everyone is looking for you”. But, Jesus was not interested in enjoy his popularity but rather up to his mission. So, he said, “Let us go to the nearby villages that I may preach there also. For this purpose have I come” (Mark 1:38).

In regard to this Gospel Reading, Mark 1:29-39, I sometimes tell this joke to my students: Jesus healed Simon’s mother-in-law so quickly so that he could eat Sabbath dinner there before Sabbath ends with sundown. But, if he did not heal her, who would wait on him with the dinner? C’mon, it’s Sabbath. And the sun will set soon.

He had a busy day in the synagogue on that day, preaching and exorcising with divine authority. He deserved to be waited on”.

Of course, it’s a joke. So, it was not for dinner that Jesus healed Peter’s mother-in-law. And, I reminded my students that we do our works of mercy for dinner. We serve each other and our neighbors, especially those in need and in mercy, unconditionally out of love – so without any expectation for reward or compensation. If we deserve something for our good deeds according to the Gospel teaching, especially in Matthew 25:31-46, then, we can find what it may be in the Second Reading (1 Corinthians 9:16-19, 22-23). And it is no earthly reward or no reward on earth. However, it is Jesus who said, “The laborer deserves his payment”(Luke 10:7). So, where is the payment for my good deeds to fulfill my “obligation” to do the works of mercy? And, such a response may be typical of “righteous” people like Job. But, humble servants of God, like Paul, know the payment comes to those who did the works of mercy out of love,  not as an obligation to avoid forfeiting the chance to go to the Kingdom, is addressed in Matthew 25:34-3: Come, you who are blessed by my Father. Inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me, naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.

Reward for our works of mercy out of love – inheriting the Kingdom! And it is for the humble – poor in spirit (Matthew 5:3).

Those who are rewarded with payment for their good deeds in the works of mercy are those who do not in obligatory way but out of love with joy. And Paul is a good example of this (i.e. 1 Corinthians 13:1-10).

Connecting Matthew 25:34, Matthew 5:3, and 1 Corinthians 13:3, to the Second Reading (1 Corinthians 9:16-19, 22-23), it is evident that service with the works of mercy out of love is carried out because of humility to be entitled to inherit the Kingdom as the “payment” or “reward” or “recompense”. If no humility, the service would be obligatory and may bring unbearable suffering.

In regard to suffering and humility, we can draw a lesson from Job.

Job in the First Reading (Job 7:1-4, 6-7) reminds us of the problem of suffering, as well as our blind spot in dealing with suffering. And, it has been a nagging problem to the humanity even today. Many people say that Job did not deserve suffering for being “righteous”. But, he suffered tremendously as God tested his “righteousness”. So, what is a lesson here? Job may be “righteous” in his own eyes for being proud of not violating any of God’s commandments. But, does it necessarily mean that Job is innocent in the eyes of God?

To find it out and understand Job’s suffering in connection to the problem of suffering, it is necessary that we read the entire Book of Job and reflect. Then, we realize that Job’s ego, justifying himself rather than God, contributed to his suffering, as so recognized by Elihu (Job 32:2). And this gives a realistic lesson that our suffering may have nothing to do with whether we are “righteous” or sinful, though sinful behaviors certainly result in suffering of ourselves and/or others. Even we think we are not so sinful as we strive for perfection according to the Law of God, we still may suffer until Christ destroys Satan for good and ushers those who deserve in New Eden with New Jerusalem, as envisioned in Revelation 21:1-22:6.

The question is how we respond to suffering – how we deal with the problem with suffering. And this is where our faith kicks in with wisdom through the Holy Spirit. As we respond to and deal with the problem of suffering, regardless of our own sinfulness, our focus is not whether we are relieved from suffering but how God is justified and glorified through our suffering (cf. Job 32:2; John 9:3; 11:4, 40). And, healing is a natural consequence of this.

Take a lesson from Paul, who suffered tremendously for the sake of Christ, yet he remained joyful in serving him and working on his salvific causes. Why Paul did not end up like Job, who complained and complained about his suffering? Both Paul and Job suffered even though they were living according to what God has said. So, to begin with, they are not supposed to suffer, right?

If your thinking is like this, you are at risk of slipping in what is called “theodicy”, and this can be due to a lack of humility.

With humility, what motivates us to do the works of mercy in our service is love – unconditional love (i.e. 1 Corinthians 13:1-10). So, it is not out of obligation or duty. It is totally out of free will. Because of this unconditional love, we can endure suffering without arguing or complaining like Job. Rather, we may be able to persevere suffering, even rejoicing in suffering, as long as we find it is for others, Paul did (Colossians 1:24). And we call it redemptive suffering. No, Paul was not a masochist. We can found joy even in our suffering while serving Christ, because we see our suffering as our participation in Christ’s suffering (1 Peter 4:13). On the other hand, Job’s focus was on himself and concerned about how good he could be seen, as Elihu saw (Job 32:2). Therefore, to Job, there is nothing but to complain in his suffering. However, Job was finally relieved from suffering as he overcome his problem of lack of humility and realize how great God is (Job 42).

We tend to take Gospel stories of Jesus’ healing with our tendency to be like Job. So, we expect our suffering to be healed as Peter’s mother-in-law was healed – being healed immediately. But, in reality, not all suffering cases necessarily go as Peter’s mother-in-law’s case. And, if not healed like this, those who are like Job tend to become God, and it is a problem with theodicy. And people like Job expect rewards rather immediately when they do good deeds for others, because their motive is not unconditional love but to be rewarded. It is because, as Elihu’s analysis of Job’s problem: tendency to glorify himself rather than God (Job 32:2).

Job was a man of hardened heart during his suffering. On the other hand, Paul was not during his suffering, because he was with the Word incarnate, Christ. In fact, Christ was in Paul (Galatians 2:20). So, he was a Christ-bearer (Christopher) in doing the works of mercy on his extensive missions and was able to bear suffering as Christ in him bore it with him. This is why Paul found joy in his suffering and it was redemptive.

It is great that suffering is removed as we want. And if this is the case, we know that God let it happen so that we can serve Him without being distracted by suffering. This is why Simon’s mother-in-law immediately served Jesus with Sabbath dinner (Mark 1:31). But, what if suffering was not removed as in the case with her?

Did Paul was relieved from suffering so that he can carry out his mission – his service for Christ without being distracted from suffering? If so, Paul would not feel like being poured out like libation as his suffering on mission continued prolonged (2 Timothy 4:6).

Was Paul bitter to feel being spent as a result of his prolonged suffering in serving Christ with his works of mercy on mission? No. Rather, his suffering and exhaustion prompted Paul to say:

I have competed well; I have finished the race; I have kept the faith. From now on the crown of righteousness awaits me, which the Lord, the just judge, will award to me on that day, and not only to me, but to all who have longed for his appearance. 2 Timothy 4:7-8

What we can learn from Paul about the problem of suffering is to recognize the suffering as an opportunity to bring glory of God out of it, preferably in the context of the works of mercy for others, because it means for Christ (Matthew 25:40, 45). So, what suffering can bring us is a hopeful prospect for reward, as Paul describes in 2 Timothy 4:7-8.  And, this is why Paul was tirelessly devoted in his works of mercy – committed to carry on the ministry of Jesus, free from temptation for earthly reward but with his hope for recompense from God, as reflected in the Second Reading (1 Corinthians 9:16-19, 22-23).

And, Jesus is the model of conducting the work of mercy – healing and teaching with his pastoral authority – as the Gospel Reading (Mark 1:29-39) gives its snap shot.

It is important to note that Jesus did not conduct healing for Simon’s mother-in-law to be rewarded with Sabbath dinner. He did not heal and exorcise many brought to him from the village for rewards or honor for himself. He did it all out of his love because he is humble and meek (Matthew 11:29). That is why Jesus did not stick around where people praised him and continued to seek him. So, he said, “Let us go on to the nearby villages that I may preach there also. For this purpose have I come”(Mark 1:38), in response to the disciples saying, “Everyone is looking for you”(Mark 1:37).


For what purpose did Jesus come? For what purpose, the Father in heaven let the Word be incarnated through Mary the Immaculate Conception to be brought to us as Jesus?

So that we may be healed as we want, as immediately as Simon’s mother-in-law was healed? Or, so that we can learn and practice what we can make out of our suffering to benefit others in light of Matthew 25:40, 45, with a hope of recompense from God but not from anyone on earth? Our suffering will be different, depending on which view we have. And what we can learn from this Sunday’s Scripture readings is that healing from suffering will naturally become reality as we respond to our suffering with humility and love, not caught in our own ego. This is a lesson from the way Job dealt with his suffering and the way Paul dealt with his suffering. For us to learn what true healing is and what we can make out of suffering for healing, based on his teaching, he came to us.

How can we respond to the problem of suffering with a lesson from this Sunday’s Scripture readings? How can we respond to suffering as people bearing Christ within? What can we make out of suffering? These are some questions to reflect on and prevent us from sinking in the problem of theodicy or to be like Job.

Blessed Justo Ukon Takayama (福者 高山ユスト右近): A Gift of Powerful Witness (Martyr) of Christian Faith from Japan to the Philippines - A Seed Sown in the Philippines from Japan by God - A Gospel Witness in Asia

 When I teach and give presentations on Catholic topics and the Scriptures to my fellow Catholics, I often encounter my audience’s surprised reactions when they learn that I am Japanese. They react as to me as if there were no Catholic in Japan. I am often mistaken for a Filipino Catholic speaker to teach on Catholic topics. At least people acknowledge Filipinos as Catholics among the Asians. But, not so with the Japanese.  Now I am tempted to pretend to be Filipino. Pero, ako Hapon.

In fact, many people find it difficult to conceptualize the existence of Christians not only in Japan but generally in Asia, except in the Philippines. Given the fact that Christians’ ratio to the entire national population of Japan barely makes up 1% Catholics and non-Catholic Christians altogether, this is no surprise.  In contrast, Christians (Catholics and non-Catholic Christians) make up about 95% of the national population of the Philippines.  Christianity was brought to the Philippines by Ferdinand Magellan in 1521 with a statue of Santo Nino and to Japan by St. Francis Xavier, accompanied by his Jesuit companions: Anjiro(Yajiro), Cosme de Torres and Juan Fernandez, in 1549. With only 28 years of difference, Christianity has been in Japan almost as long as it has been in the Philippines. However, in regard to the quantity of Christians, there is a remarkably huge gap between the Philippines and Japan. Then, what about the qualities of the Christianity in the Philippines and in Japan?  Do you think that the quality of Christianity in Japan is less than that in the Philippines, reflecting the quantities?

To know the quality of Christian faith in Japan and to overcome the ignorance about the Catholics in Asia, particularly, in Japan, meet Bl. Ukon Justo Takayama (高山 ユスト 右近), whose life of faith is honored on February 3 in the Liturgical Calendar of the Roman Catholic Church.  Ukon was born to the samurai family of Tomoteru Takayama (高山 友照) in the province of Settsu (now northern Osaka), Japan, in 1552, a year after Xavier left Japan.

Bl. Ukon Justo Takayama  is a lay Japanese Catholic dynamo (samurai provincial lord ) in evangelization during the extensive period of feudal turmoil in Japan spanning from the late 16th century into the early 17th century. Ukon was instrumental in realizing many dreams of St. Francis Xavier, who came to Japan in 1549 and began evangelizing with struggles with a vision to set Japan on fire of faith, while winning many Japanese souls for Christ. At the same time, Ukon’s faith with his faith-driven actions of evangelization is a fruit of the seeds of evangelization sown in Japan by St. Francis Xavier between 1549 and 1551, because Ukon was baptized into the Catholic Church as his father, Tomoteru Takayama, decide to be baptized to become Christian as a result of listening to a Japanese story teller, who became Christian as a result of listening to St. Francis Xavier. And this story teller, who impacted Ukon’s father to become Christian together with his son, Ukon, and the rest of his family, and all of samurais under his command, is Lawrence Ryosai (ロレンソ了斎).

At first, Lawrence Ryosai, who was almost blind since his birth, was a biwa-playing story teller. Ryosai’s story telling was always gravitating because of his extraordinary knowledge of Shinto and Buddhism. Biwa is a traditional Japanese string instrument. Ryosai decided to become Christian upon being impressed by homily given by St. Francis Xavier and baptized by him in 1551, the year Xavier left Japan.  Having become Christian, Ryosai’s story telling with his biwa playing were just as great as Catholic priest’s homilies that touch our hearts and move us deeply. He remained instrumental to the Jesuit missionaries coming to Japan after Xavier, and he himself became Jesuit later, though not ordained as a priest.

In 1559, Ukon’s father, Tomoteru, had an opportunity to listen to Lawrence Ryosai. He was tremendously impressed by Ryosai’s way of arguing for Christianity in contrast to Buddhism and Shinto. As a result, Tomoteru decided to become Christian together with all of his family members, including Ukon, and all of his samurai servants under his command.  And, Ukon received his Christian name, Justo, which means justice, upon his Baptism in 1564. The timing was just perfect as it was around the time for Ukon’s Genpuku ceremony, the coming-of-age ritual ceremony for samurai’s son to be recognized as mature enough to be given swords for himself. And this is how Ukon Justo Takayama begun to grow as Japan’s most notorious Christian samurai as a fruit of the evangelization seed sown by St. Francis Xavier and later becoming a seed of faith sown in the Philippines. 

Though Bl. Ukon Justo Takayama and St. Francis Xavier never met in person, they are connected to each other as the sower and a rich fruit grown out of a seed.  And it is Lawrence Ryosai who connects Ukon to Xavier for further abundant fruits of Xavier’s seeds of evangelization in Japan.

As a young Christian samurai, Ukon exhibited his loyalty to his father and to his family’s master samurai feudal lord, demonstrating his extraordinary valor and impressive battle tactics. It may evoke Joshua in conquering Canaan for the Jewish settlement and David in securing the geopolitical status of the Kingdom of Israel upon conquering Jerusalem, as its king. Both Joshua and David are not only excellent warriors but also men of exemplary steadfast faith in God – loyal servants of God.

The way Ukon served his samurai feudal lord as a young samurai must have reflected his faith in Christ – the way he dedicated himself to Christ, his true and everlasting Lord. However, as a young samurai, Ukon’s faith in Christ was not really mature yet. This is why Francis Cabral and Luis Frois, Jesuit priests, came to visit Ukon in his Takatsuki castle and gave him a discourse on Deus (God) in 1574.

The Japanese word, “samurai”()  literally mean a man who serves as a temple guard, based on the Chinese character for this word.  Every samurai had his own lord to serve and protect to a point of sacrificing his own life. This servant character of samurai bode well with the servant nature of being Christian – being disciples of Christ, as St. Paul of Tarsus puts it (i.e. Romans 1:1; Colossians 1:23).  The way samurai is bound to his feudal lord in service parallels the way Christians, disciples of Christ, are bound to Christ the Lord as his servants. And Christians are obedient and courageous “soldiers of Christ”, in fighting Christ’s enemies and defending his truth and the Word, as defined in the Catechism of Trent for the Sacrament of Confirmation.

Given the servant nature as a common factor between being a samurai and a Christian (soldier of Christ) , perhaps, these words of Jesus could have attracted samurais:

You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord over them, and the great ones make their authority over them felt. But it shall not be so among you. Rather, whoever wishes to be great among you shall be your servant; whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave. Just so, the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for many (Matthew 20:25-28).

The greatest among you must be your servant, Whoever exalts himself will be humbled; but whoever humbles himself will be exalted (Matthew 23:11-12).

As a young samurai, Ukon already distinguished himself for his unmatched gung-ho drive in a battle and contribution to his lord’s victories.  While many other young samurais admired him and were inspired by him, some became jealous of him and plotted to assassinate him together with his father. Remember, Ukon lived during an extensive period of feudal conflict mainly resulting from the decline in the Ashikaga Shogunate’s central ruling power.  As the Ashikaga’s central control power waned, many power-hungry local provincial samurais began competing for the next Shogunate power to be the central ruler or to side with samurai lords who were believed to become the next ruler of the feudal Japan, such as chancellor, as well as a self-appointed regent to even arrogate the Emperor’s power. In such a chaotic situation, those who served loyally could betray their master lords at any time whenever power balance changed. When their master lords died in battle or in assassination samurais had to find their new lords to serve or throw themselves in this power-competition game to promote themselves in the feudal rank, gaining samurai servants for themselves. 

In 1573, a plot to kill Ukon and his father, Tomoteru, became a reality. The assassination attempt was made by a young samurai lord, who used to admire Ukon and sought advice from him. Though Ukon was able to defeat this contester, he himself was gravely wounded in his defense. Though he could have died from the wound, Ukon made rather a miraculous recovery. And this must have strengthened his faith in God. This is similar to how St. Ignatius of Loyola found himself drawn to God and began recognizing his calling to serve God while recovering from his near mortal wound from the Battle of Pamprona in 1521. Ukon must have realized God’s care for him as Ignatius did and further drawn closer to Him during his recovery from the wound.

Jealous rivalry, however, was not the only thing Ukon attracted for his distinct excellence as a young samurai.  Ukon’s military accomplishments and outstanding battle skills were highly recognized by Oda Nobunaga (織田信長), the military chancellor of the Ashikaga Shogunate, and  by Toyotomi Hideshoshi (豊臣秀吉), the Chancellor-Regent, who succeeded Oda Nobunaga. Nobunaga and Hideyoshi were the leading figures in sequence during the extensive period of political instability and power-game battles from the latter half of the 16th century to the establishment of the Tokugawa Shogunate in 1603. Until Nobunaga’s death in 1582, Hideyoshi served Oda.



Because Nobunaga was open to Christian missionaries and permitted them to evangelize in Japan, Ukon was instrumental to establishing a seminary in Azuchi, which was where Nobunaga built Azuchi Castle for himself in 1576 and considered as his city. The Azuchi Seminary opened its door for aspiring Japanese seminarians in 1580, and one of the seminarians at this seminary was St. Paul Miki, the first Japanese Jesuit who was martyred in 1597 with his 25 companions, including San Pedro Bautista, a Spanish Franciscan from Manila, on the hill of Nishizaka in Nagasaki. Setting the very first pipe organ from Europe, in 1581, at the Azuchi Seminary that he contributed to establish, Ukon sponsored to celebrate Mass in a grand scale for the Resurrection of Christ, having Fr. Alessandro Valignano, a Jesuit expert on missiology, well-known for writing, “Il Cerimoniale per i Missionari del Giappone”, a culturally adopted missionary guideline for Jesuits in Japan.  In this Jesuit manual for missionary in Japan, Valignano said that Jesuits on mission in Japan should behave like the feudal ruling class, namely, daimyos (samurai provincial lords), to be respected and to make it easier to evangelize. This missiology approach was based on the unique social character of the feudal Japan of that time. However, the Franciscan missionary sharply criticized Valignano’s method as they thought that it would neglect the Gospel-mandate care for the poor. This is certainly a debatable topic even today in missiology with inculturation. However, if you bring the example of Justo Ukon’s way of evangelization, Valignano’s approach can make sense. Ukon was in a ruling samurai class of the Japanese feudal social structure. At the same time, he was in touch with the hearts of ordinary citizens, including the poor, with compassion in his province. It was because his governance as a provincial lord was driven by his Christian faith, according to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. And, he governed his province with justice, as his Christian name, “Justo”, means. Justice, of course, comes with compassion to be in line with God’s justice.

It was also Ukon who built church in Osaka, a major gateway city to the imperial capitol of Japan, Kyoto, in 1583. He covered the cost of the construction, after the land was provided by Toyotomi Hideyoshi, who became the ruler of Japan as regent-chancellor, after Oda Nobunaga’s death in 1582. During that time, many of the servants of Toyotomi Hideyoshi also became Christian because of Ukon.

At that time, Ukon was the daimyo (provincial samurai lord) of the province of Settsu, residing in Takatsuki Castle. He governed his province with justice, reflecting his Christian name, “Justo”, and mercy. For example, when rice harvest was low, he exempted farmers from tax. He is said to have carried a casket at a funeral of a citizen in his province, though it was a task for an underclass man. Ukon governed the Province of Setts as a Christian ruler, reflecting Christ’s teaching in his Gospel. Because of this, Ukon in maintained a good working relation with people. This is why nearly 80% of the people of his province had become Christian.

Ukon was a very dynamic evangelizer not only to ruling class samurais but also to ordinary people under the samurai feudal rule. His enthusiasm in evangelization to bring more people to become Christians may be comparable to that of St. Francis Xavier, St. Ignatius of Loyola, and St. Paul of Tarsus, even though Ukon is a lay Christian.  Ukon’s gung-ho drive was not only in battle but also in evangelization. One of the samurai rulers, who converted and became Christian, really became a new person by abandoning a sinful life of having multiple concubines and chosing a life of chastity with one wife, as a result of Ukon’s evangelization.

Ukon really set the feudal Japan on fire of the Gospel of Christ and the Holy Spirit, though he was not necessarily well-versed with the Scriptures and the catechism. Obviously, Ukon was very charismatic in sharing how great it is to be Christian, perhaps, in juxtaposition to something so gravitating to being Christian in Lawrence Ryosai’s biwa playing story telling. A main reason for Ukon’s evangelization was so gravitating is that he gave his personal witness to a revelation of the mystery of Christ in his testimonies, rather than being preachy in boasting about how much he knew about the Scriptures and catechism.

In 1584, by order of Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Ukon was transferred to govern the province of Akashi from the province of Setts, becoming the daimyo of Akashi. This was meant to be promotion given to Ukon by Hideyoshi. But, it was also when trials began to loom over him. Around that time, one of Hideyoshi’s cabinet members threatened Ukon to conspire Hideyoshi that Ukon was plotting a rebellion against him. To this, Ukon resolvedly responded to confront such a matter with truth in his loyalty to Hideyoshi without compromising his absolute loyalty to Christ the Lord. In fact, Hideyoshi really valued Ukon and trusted him. And, Uknon valued Hideyoshi’s confidence in him. But, it was more of his faith in Christ that enabled Ukon to stand against such a conspiracy threat against him with his firm resolve.

When Ukon accompanied Hideyoshi in his battle campaign in Kyushu, 1587, Hideyoshi made a drastic change of his policy in regard to Christianity in Japan. He issued a decree to prohibit Christianity in Japan and to expel all foreign missionaries from Japan. What possibly contributed to this sudden change in Hideyoshi’s stance to Christianity was that he began to see the rapid spread of Christianity in Japan as a great threat to the existence of the Japanese religious tradition, constituted with Shinto and Buddhism. Hideyoshi realized that more Buddhist temples and Shinto shrines were in ruin and desolation where Christians were concentrated. In fact, Kyshu had the highest Christian ratio to the general population than any other regions of Japan. Therefore, the decline of those who practice Shinto and Buddhism was more evident in Kyushu than anywhere else in Japan. Furthermore, Hideyoshi also began to feel a threat from the firm solidarity among Christians in Japan to his ambition to remain in his political power as ruler of Japan. And Hideyoshi was well-aware that Ukon was responsible for the fast-paced increase of Christians and the Christian solidarity in Japan.  This change of Hideyoshi’s policy on Christians in Japan is like how Egypt changed its policy on the Jews in Egypt – from being tolerant to oppressive because of the growth of the Jewish population, as written in Exodus 1.

Nevertheless, Hideyoshi was hoping that Ukon would apostatize for his sake and for his confidence in Ukon. He did not want to lose Ukon for this foreign religion, called Christianity, as he did not want to see traditional Japanese religious custom, Shinto and Buddhism, decline. Although Hideyoshi himself was quite tolerant of Christianity before, especially while his predecessor chancellor, Nobunaga was in his power. And Hideyoshi supported Ukon’s evangelization efforts because he valued Ukon’s distinguished valor and battle skills. So Hideyoshi demanded Ukon to give up his Christian faith for the sake of the loyalty to him and his ambition to stabilize Japan and rule with his own Shogunate.

To this, Ukon resolvedly refused to turn his back against Christ, even disobeying his order could result in execution, and chose to rather lose his privilege as a samurai lord by leaving the domain of Hideyoshi.  And he was not even afraid of losing his life for the sake of Christ. But, Ukon also made it clear that his refusal to apostatize as Hideyoshi desired was not out of his disrespect. So, this is how Ukon responded to Hideyoshi’s demand to give up his faith in Christ:

私が殿を侮辱した覚えは全くなく、高槻の家来や明石の家臣たちをキリシタンにしたのは私の手柄である。キリシタンをやめることに関しては、たとえ全世界を与えられようとも致さぬし、自分の(霊魂の)救済と引き替えることはしない。よって私の身柄、領地については、殿が気に召すように取り計らわれたい.

I have always been loyal to you with reverence – never insulted you, to my best recollection. It is my responsibility, however, that my servants both in Settsu and Akashi had become Christians. I will never trade my faith in Christ and forfeit the salvation of my soul even for the whole world to be in my disposition. Therefore, I hereby submit myself, my body and my province, to your disposition.  (translation mine).

Not even a prospect of becoming the ruler of the whole world will not tempt Ukon to abandon his faith in Christ. This firm resolve of Ukon evokes how Jesus fended off Satan’s temptation to bow down to him in exchange for the ruling power over the entire world (Matthew 4:8-10). And Ukon will never trade his soul’s salvation for anything, reflecting these words of Jesus:

Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, be afraid of the one who can destroy both soul and body in Gehena (Matthew 10:28).

What profit would there be for one to gain the whole world and forfeit his soul? (Matthew 16:26).

Because this decision to choose Christ over Hideyoshi as his true lord to serve, Ukon lost all his privileges as a samurai lord and his promising future in Hideyoshi’s political power. He and his family were reduced to homeless wonderers in exile. To borrow Flannery O’Conner’s word, Ukon and his family chose to be “displaced” from the feudal power game of the secular world. In exchange, he and his family gained freedom – becoming unfettered, even though risk of being executed by Hideyoshi remained for defying him.

To this Hidesyoshi was certainly disappointed. But, he seemed to have rather grieved over losing a great warrior and strategist and governor. Rather than reacting in his anger, Hideyoshi must have been impressed by how strong Ukon’s Christian faith was to a point of his awe.

As a matter of fact, it was Hideyoshi who sought out Ukon to meet him for reconciliation in 1592. Though he could have refused, thinking it as Hidehyoshi’s tricky trap to kill him, Ukon came out and met with his former “boss” over a tea ceremony session in Nagoya castle of Kyushu (not to be confused with Nagoya castle in Nagoya, central Japan). It was an amicable meeting. Hideyoshi did not demand Ukon to apostatize anymore. Rather, he expressed his concern for the wellbeing of Ukon to have lived as a wonder. So, Hideyoshi assured Ukon that he did not have to be “invisible” any more as he can now on present himself publically – though he cannot redeem his former privileges. In fact, it was much a relief to Ukon.

Fortunately, Ukon and his family were able to live under the care of his friends, who were also provincial samurai lords in various parts of Japan.  Ukon told a Jesuit priest, Luis Frois, that it was God’s grace to keep him and his family alive and well even being reduced to poverty by defying Hideyoshi for Christ. And, he lived in such a way until his actual expulsion from Japan in 1614.

During these “displacement” or “exile” years in Japan, Ukon and his Christian family could have been arrested at any moment for execution, even though he and Hideyoshi reconciled in 1592. The risk of his arrest for execution had become much higher upon the 1596 San Felipe ship wreck incident, which triggered Hideyoshi to order the execution of the 26 Christians in 1597 in Nagasaki. The lives of these 26 martyred are memorialized and honored in the Catholic Church on their feast day, February 6.  The 26 martyred include St. Paul Miki, one of the first Japanese Jesuit seminarians to study at the Azuchi Seminary that Ukon helped to build, a son of samurai.  Another one is San Pedro Bautista, a Spanish Franciscan friar from the Philippines, who also served as Spanish Ambassador to make peace with Hideyoshi in 1593, in response to Hideyoshi’s threat to the Philippines in 1591, demanding Spain to recognize Hideyoshi as the superior power not only in Japan but in Asia, including the Philippines.  And the 26 martyred saints also include San Felipe de Jesus, a Mexican Franciscan seminarian returning to Mexico from the Philippines, and St. Louis Ibaraki, a 12-year old Japanese Christian boy, the youngest among the 26, known for preaching to his executioner to become Christian shortly before being put to his cross. Hideyoshi made his decision to tighten up the persecution of Christians in Japan upon the Spanish galleon’s shipwreck because this incident, San Felipe incident, resulted in a conspiracy that the Spanish Franciscan priests on the galleon, San Felipe, were Spanish invaders to colonize Japan. An officer under Hideyoshi’s command, who investigated this shipwreck incident, made a false report with the conspiracy against Christians, as Roman Emperor Nero not only justified his persecution policy against Christians in the Roman Empire but to turn Roman citizens to view Christians as their enemies by falsely accusing Christians for being the culprit of the great fire in Rome in 64 AD.

An anti-Christian officer in the Hideyoshi’s administration knew about Ukon and wanted to kill him during these years leading to the San Felipe incident in 1596 and the 1597 execution of 26 Christians in Nagasaki. In fact, Ukon was originally top on the list for the 1597 Christian execution in Nagasaki, along with Paul Miki and Pedro Bautista and other Christians arrested in Kyoto and Osaka. However, unbeknownst to him, Ukon’s name was deleted from this “black list” because of influential samurai lords, who understood Ukon very well. One of them is Toshiie Maeda (前田利家), daimyo of the province of Kaga (Kanazawa, today), who is a close friend of Ukon through Sado (the way of tea). Both Ukon and Toshiie are among top seven disciples of Sen no Rikyu (千利休), the grand tea master of Japan.  In fact, Toshiie was very supportive of Ukon during his exile and even Ukon join in his battle campaign, bringing in a great victory. So, the friendship bond between Ukon and Toshiie was very strong, even though Toshiie was not Christian.

Hideyoshi died in 1598, in the following year that he had executed 26 Christians in Nagasaki.  It was the same year when Felipe (Philipp) II, king of Spain, died. Hideyoshi’s limitless hunger for hegemony threatened this Spanish king, demanding him to surrender the Philippines, the Spanish colony named after him, to Hideyoshi. Spain could have had a war with Hideyoshi’s forces. But Spain was reluctant to choose a bloody method to resolve this issue with Hideyoshi, knowing how militarized Japan was. So, Spain sent San Pedro Bautista, a Spanish Franciscan friar based in the Philippines, to negotiate for peace with Japan.  By the grace of God working through San Pedro Bautista, a possible war between Felipe II’s Spanish forces and Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s forces over the Philippines was averted when San Pedro Bautista and Toyotomi Hideyoshi met in Japan, in 1593. At this meeting, Hideyoshi also allowed San Pedro Bautista to bring his Franciscan missionaries from the Philippines to Japan in 1593. Though he was able to make peace and work amicably with contentious Hideyoshi, San Pedro Bautista was treated mercilessly and executed because Hideyoshi was persuaded by the groundless report that the Franciscans aboard San Felipe, which was washed off to the coast of Japan, were Spanish spies to colonize Japan. Ukon could have been martyred together with San Pedro Bautista with other Franciscans, St. Paul Miki, St. Louis Ibaraki, San Felipe de Jesus, and 23 more companions. And, Ukon was aware of that possibility all the time. However, Ukon was not afraid and ready to die for Christ. And, it was mainly thanks to his engagement with the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola to keep him out of fear, maintaining inner peace throughout this difficult time. He was really benefitted from the Spiritual Exercises in remaining resolved to die for Christ, as the words of Christ in Matthew 10:28 inspire.

The persecution against Christians in Japan became fare more severe as Tokugawa Ieyasu (徳川家康) took the reign of Japan in establishing his central feudal government, Shogunate, in Edo (Tokyo) in 1603. From the beginning of his reign, the Tokugawa Shogunate had no mercy to Christians in Japan and became more vigorous in persecuting. The execution of the 26 Christians in 1597 by order of Hideyoshi was just a beginning of persecutory executions of Christians. 

In 1614, Ukon and his family had to leave Maeda’s castle in Kaga due to Ieyasu’s 1613 decree to expel all Christian missionaries from Japan. Ieyasu was rather very careful about handling Ukon, knowing how Christians in Japan could rebel against the Shogunate. To minimize this risk, Ieyasu thought that it would be the best interest of his administration to expel Ukon and his family, along with missionaries and other Christians. On September 24, 1914, official order from Ieyasu was issued to expel Ukon and his family. And the ship that carried Ukon and his family, together with other Christians and missionaries, left the port of Nagasaki and arrived in December. The voyage was extremely difficult and dangerous, as the ship was rather inferior and defective, unfit for navigation, because of so many problems, including constant water leaks. So, they had to scoop the water out of the ship constantly during the voyage.

Upon his arrival in Manila, Ukon and his family received a red-carpet welcome by Spanish governor of the Philippines and citizens of Manila. It was really a hero’s welcome. Ukon’s extraordinary and exemplary life of Christian faith had been known to the Spanish authority and missionaries prior to his arrival. Ukon’s presence in Manila was certainly inspiring to Christians in the Philippines. However, Ukon remained humble and kindly declined Spanish governor’s offer of lavish treat. Because one of the very few things Ukon brought from Japan with him was his favorite tea bowl. There has been a speculation that Ukon might have had a small tea ceremony in Manila. Though he was seen as a hero in faith by Christians in Manila, Ukon remained rather low-key and died on February 5, 1615.

What do you make out of the story of Bl. Ukon Justo Takayama’s life of steadfast faith in Christ? Are you surprised to know that there was such a hero in Christian faith in Japan,  in Asia, in case you had thought that there was no Christian in Japan?

As it was the case with St. Ignatius of Loyola, Bl. Ukon Justo Takayama traded his military and political ambition for his faith-driven service to Christ. Both St. Ignatius of Loyola and Bl. Ukon Justo Takayama were warriors with extraordinary courage and battle skills. And, both were gung-ho in what they were committed to, and both of them were so in serving Christ, keeping the spiritual zeal for the Kingdom of God. And as Ignatius developed the Spiritual Exercises out of his struggles with the torments of his passion in Manresa, Ukon engaged with Ignatius’ Spiritual Exercises to overcome the torments of his passion during his difficult years with increasing persecution.

Ukon’s martyrdom is like John’s martyrdom, because both John and Ukon died in exile because of their faith in Christ. As John was believed to have been spared from bloody form of martyrdom to give witnesses of the mystery of the incarnated Christ through his testimony in his unique way, perhaps, so was Ukon to bring testimonies of his witnesses to Christ from Japan to the Philippines.

Christianization was more advanced in the Philippines than in Japan. So, why the Philippines need a testimony from a country where Christianization progress was in struggle? We tend to think that it is Japan, therefore, in need of more Christian testimonies to advance in evangelization.

Ever since he was a young promising rising star samurai, Ukon was giving his testimony of his personal witness of Christ to his fellow samurais, daimyos, and other noblemen, as well as ordinary people. He continued to do so even after Hideyoshi banned Christianity and  he was reduced to a wonder in exile because he did not give up his faith in Christ as Hideyoshi ordered. It was very dangerous to keep giving testimonies and evangelize under Hideyoshi’s prohibition. But, Ukon continued on with his evangelization through his testimonies. And, his testimony giving was extended to the Philippines as it is where his exile ended. Perhaps, this is how God wanted Ukon to serve Him, and Ukon certainly fulfilled God’s will for him.

Because Christianity in the Philippines was protected and rather forced by the Spanish colonial authority, a testimony of Christianity under severe persecution from Ukon was much needed in the Philippines and benefitted the quality of Christianity in the Philippines. God must have chosen Ukon to contribute to Christianity in the Philippines in such a way and to die there as a seed to bring more high-quality servant soldiers of Christ, like Ukon, from the Philippines to Japan as persecution in Japan continue to rage on. Perhaps, for this reason, Ukon was spared from the 1597 execution in Nagasaki.

For Ukon’s feast, February 3, we celebrate his extraordinary life of faith in honor his martyrdom in exile, beginning with these words in the opening prayer:

Let us pray. Almighty and merciful God who brought your martyr Blessed Ukon to overcome the torments of his passion, grant that we who celebrate the day of his triumph may remain invincible under your protection against snares of the enemy through our Lord Jesus Christ your Son, who lives and reigns with you, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, One God, forever and ever.  Amen. 

In this prayer, we see Ukon as a person of faith, who has overcome the torments of his passion – a faithful samurai, who has won internal battles of distress caused by fear and anxiety. As his swords became his cross, he was able to convert his attachment to honor, status, castle, territory, every treasured tools of tea ceremony (except for the bowl given by his tea master, Sen no Riyu for his excellence in tea), and his own life into his secure attachment to Christ, as Jesus desires (John 14:20) and as envisioned in the branches connected to the vine to bear abundant fruits (John 15:1-10). And the great amount of fruits that Ukon produced through his life of faith were the samurais and ordinary people who became Christians because they were moved and touched by Ukon and the way he lived. Perhaps, there was no other lay Christian who has moved as many people as he did to become Christians as Ukon in Japan.  There were not many missionary priests whose records come close to Ukon’s in “winning the souls” for Christ.  But, what matters more than his record of “winning” is the quality of Ukon’s  life of Christian faith and his character, because these are what really gravitated others to become Christian like him. Yes, Ukon is truly one of the fishers of men for Christ (Matthew 4:19//Mark 1:17).

The bottom line of Ukon’s fruitfulness is his secure attachment to Christ as fruitful branches are securely attached to the vine as all unfruitful factors and detrimental factors to the fruitfulness have been pruned out by his spiritual sword.  To keep his fruitfulness unfettered, Ukon remained to be a Christian samurai per excellence as he put the full armor of God: the belt of truth, the breastplate of righteousness, the combat boots of the readiness from the Gospel of peace, the shield of faith, the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Holy Spirit to remain fearless and to make known the mystery of Christ’s Gospel as his ambassador (Ephesians 6:10-20). Yes, Ukon served Christ as his amurai ambassador in Japan for converting so many and also in the Philippines to give powerful witness in his testimony.  And the bottom-line character of Ukon, secure attachment to Christ, is reflected in the First Reading (Romans 8:35-39). Ukon must have resolvedly believe that nothing can separate him and his family from the love of God. When he was going through very difficult time during his exile years with increasing persecution, while many Christians were apostatizing for their lives, Ukon remained resolved to offer up his life for Christ out of love, which is one of many fruits he bore as a branch (Galatians 5:22; John 15:5). And to keep himself in internal peace, Ukon also practiced the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola to remain in Christ’s love, letting nothing separate him from Christ, conquering the torments of his passion (Romans 8:35-39),  as the branches are not separated from the vine to remain fruitful (John 15:1-10).

Because of his internal security in Christ, Ukon remained fruitful in evangelizing as a fisher of men for Christ. The Respnsorial Psalm (Psalm 126) and the Gospel Reading (John 12:23-28) reflect Ukon’s fruitfulness as a seed sown to the ground – a seed that dies in the ground as sown – to bring even more abundant fruit for greater harvest for the Kingdom of God, in glorifying God.

Though his martyrdom did not come with fatal bloodshed, Ukon was resolved to die for Christ and remained as a witness to Christ in giving testimonies to evangelize more even during these dangerous years in exile under persecution. It must be God’s will for Ukon not to let him die in the hands of persecutors but to keep him as a powerful witness gift to be sent to the Philippines from Japan.

San Pedro Bautista was one of the seeds that were sown and died in the ground of Nishizaka in Nagasaki on February 5. 1597, as a gift from the Philippines to Japan. And Bl Justo Ukon Takayama was a seed sown and died in the soil of the Philippines on February 3, 1615, as a gift from Japan to the Philippines.

Though he only lived for 40 days (44 days in some accounts) in Manila upon his arrival from Nagasaki, Ukon gave moving testimonies to Filipinos and Spaniards as a powerful witness to Christ. Because Christianity was not only protected but promoted by the Spanish rulers, Ukon’s testimonies from Japan of witnessing Christ amidst of increasing persecution were very moving to both Filipinos and Spaniards. Perhaps, because of this, many Filipinos and Spaniards went to Japan, knowing that it means no to return to the Philippines alive. Though he probably never met Ukon in person in Manila, San Lorenzo Ruiz, the first Filipino saint, who was martyred in Nagasaki in 1637, and his Dominican companions, were just some of the abundant harvest impacted by the seed of gift from Japan in 1615, Blessed Ukon JustoTakayama.

Now as you see, Japan and the Philippines have been one in bringing rich fruits to the Kingdom of God, where Christ reigns as the King. Knowing this, you will never mistakenly think that there is no Christian in Japan and in the rest of Asia.

Look beyond Japan and the Philippines in Asia, you sure find more of great seeds sown and died to have resulted in greater harvests for Christ’s Kingdom.

To the ignorance about the Catholics and Catholicism in Japan and in the rest of Asia, let seeds of grains be sown and die with the ignorance so that the truth in the mystery of the incarnated Christ be revealed to bring abundant harvest of faith. And may Bl. Ukon Justo Takayama continue to be this seed of grain for years to come so that more and more harvests of faith be enjoyed both in Japan and in the Philippines, impacting the rest of the world for the greater glory of God – Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam.