Sunday, October 21, 2018

"Sólo Dios Basta ..Tu Gracia Me Basta": Freedom from Anxiety in Christ - Salutogenic Pastoral Psychology from St. Teresa of Avila and St. Ignatius of Loyola


Anxiety has been plaguing us globally (i.e. Remes et al., 2016).  Because anxiety is closely associated with depression as a stress-related disorder (i.e. Kumar & Akoijam, 2017), the world-wide epidemic of anxiety may mean that so many people in the world have been under distress and gasping for a relief in depression.
  
The global epidemic of anxiety can trace its possible origin to Genesis 3, when Eve and Adam disobeyed their Creator, God, and allowed Satan’s destructive influence affect the original harmony between God the Creator and the human.  The disharmony in our relationship with God means our anxiety, as it is a reflection of our insecure attachment with God. This based on research studies on anxiety, juxtapositionally applying the mother-child attachment theory of Bowlby and Ainsworth (i.e. Ainsworth, 1989) to a possible correlation between out attachment to God and our well-being (i.e. Bradshaw et al., 2010, & Ellison et al., 2012).
  
Upon the fall by biting the forbidden fruit, Adam and Eve began experiencing anxiety, as they hid themselves from God – feeling shame but not really sorry for God by not being obedient to Him. Their self -awareness of being naked signals that they gained ego, as a result of the fall. Thus, Genesis 3 reminds that the today’s epidemic of anxiety has its origin to Adam and Eve becoming self-awareness with ego upon their fall, as ego-consciousness, shame, and anxiety are significantly associated (i.e. Muris et al., 2018).
  
To juxtapose the current state of anxiety epidemic with Dante Alighieri’s “Divine Comedy”, it is like “Inferno”. Fortunately, since the Father in heaven, the Creator, who remains to be rachum v’chanun (compassionate, merciful, and gracious), sent His only begotten Son, the Christ, to us out of His chesed – unbreakable everlasting love of God for us – so that he can shepherd us out of “Inferno” of anxiety epidemic state. That is why the Son is the Christ, whose mission is to deliver us from the “Inferno” of anxiety, which is associated with our sins since Adam and Eve, to the “Paradiso”, where we are totally free from anxiety, as well as any other effects of the Original Sin. As Moses and Joshua led the Israelites from Egypt to the Promised Land in Canaan in Exodus, Christ the Good Shepherd (John 10:11-18) and the Holy Spirit, another Parakletos, (John 14:16, 26),  lead our exodus journey from the “Inferno” of anxiety to “Paradiso” of freedom. The journey is our “Purgatorio”.  Upon becoming followers of Christ and receiving the Holy Spirit, we leave the “Inferno” and enter into the “Purgatorio” with the hope of successfully entering the “Paradiso”.

So, what are we to do to embark on this exodus journey of the “Purgatorio” from the anxiety “Inferno” to the “Paradiso” of freedom?  

More psychiatrists and psychologists to combat this mental health epidemic?  Perhaps so, but this is a typical answer by those who do not know God.  These mental health clinicians may provide helpful therapeutic service to some extent. As a pastoral psychologist, however, I meet many clients who express their frustration and dissatisfaction with conventional mental health treatments (psychotherapy and medication) , seeking a pastoral approach to overcome anxieties and anxiety-related psychosomatic problems. In response, my role for them is to facilitate the growth of faith for them so that they can benefit from salutogenic effects of grace that God has given us through Christ the Son and the Holy Spirit, another Parakletos, nahum, who can naham (experience sorrow for us) out of rechem (compassion).

Is the pastoral psychological service evidence-based? Yes, according to Hook et al. (2010) and a comprehensive review of relevant research studies in the Handbook of Religion and Health (2nd ed) by Koenig, King, and Carson (2012) . More empirical research studies to further verify clinical efficacy of pastoral (religious and spiritual) therapeutic approach to treat anxiety and other psychosomatic distresses are forthcoming. Now science is finally catching up with clinical efficacy as what Antonovsky (1979) has called “salutogenesis”  within our inner core, facilitated through God’s grace, which comes through Christ and the Holy Spirit, who is another Parakletos. However, salutogenesis in the pastoral context is based on faith (pistis, which literally means trust and confidence) in the source of salutogenic grace: God, as indicated by Jesus in Mark 5:34 ; 6:1-5.

Salutogenesis through faith-based pastoral psychological care focuses on faith’s combatant and protective effects against anxiety and its related problems, such as stress-induced depression, as it was made known by Jesus, about 2,000 years ago, as various Gospel narratives describe.  In his Sermon on the Mount, Jesus “prescribed” the best inoculation to anxieties and distresses.  In Matthew 5:25-34, Jesus reminds us that the best way to fight anxiety is to find the locus of life in God, rather than ego - nothing else, by encouraging us to seek God’s Kingdom and justice first (Matthew 5:33). The Kingdom is the “Paradiso”, the state of freedom from anxiety, and this true freedom only comes through Christ (John 8:34-36). Thus, to be in the Kingdom, which Jesus calls us to seek first to be free from anxiety, we must find our life in Christ, as it is the freedom as Paul describes in Romans 8. In fact, Jesus’ call on us to be delivered from the “Inferno” of anxiety into his Kingdom, the “Paradiso”, the freedom in Christ,  is echoed by St. Augustine of Hippo.  In  “Confession”,  St. Augustine said, “Fecisti nos ad te, Domine, et inquietum est cor nostrum donec requiescat in te”( You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you).

Now, how can we seek the Kingdom of God, the freedom,  in order to overcome and prevent anxiety?

According to two 16th century Spanish Catholic mystics – St. Teresa of Avila and St. Ignatius of Loyola, it is all about completely entrusting God by surrendering and dissolving ego to God, as Teresa’s “Nada te turbe” (nothing disturbs you) prayer and Ignatius’ “Suscipe”(receive) prayer reflect.  These poetic prayers invite us, as St. Teresa of Avila and St. Ignatius of Loyola did, to surrender our ego to the will of God – offering it up, asking God to receive it. To let go of our ego, which tends to focus on the worldly things rather than God, Teresa prayed:

Vénganle desamparos,
cruces, desgracias;
siendo Dios tu tesoro
nada te falta.

Id, pues, bienes del mundo;
id dichas vanas;
aunque todo lo pierda,
sólo Dios basta.

And, Ignatius prayed more radically:

Toma, Señor, y recibe mi libertad,
mi memoria, mi entendimiento y toda mi voluntad,
todo mi haber y mi poseer.

The above words in the two 16th-century Spanish mystics’ prayers are about denouncing our worldly attachment by resolving ego into God, and reflecting what Paul said in Galatians 2:20. Perhaps, this is like what nekkhamma is for nirvana in Buddhism’s Dharma teaching.

To put this important denunciation of worldly attachment and resolution of ego in Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino indigenous psychology), we find our true kapwa (authentic self identity) in oneness with Christ (i.e. John 14:20; 15:1-9), as kapwa requires another being to understand who we are.  When we surrender and resolve our ego completely to Christ , we find our kapwa in Christ, namely becoming  one with him,  as Paul said in Galatians 2:20. When we attain this state, we can begin to experience the Kingdom – the “Paradiso” freedom from anxieties. Until then,  on our  exodus journey through the “Purgatorio”, we say to ourselves, making salvific and salutogenic self-fulfilling prophecy, “Nada me turbe….nada me espante…porque quien a Dios tiene nada le falta…por eso sólo Dios basta…Si, porque sólo Dios basta, no me preocupo….tu gracia me basta…”, as St. Teresa and St. Ignatius have prayed on their exodus.

In my pastoral psychology practice, I invite my clients, especially those who speak and understand Spanish, to reflect their journeys in “Pugatorio” upon below prayers of St. Teresa of Avila and St. Ignatius of Loyola.

Nada te turbe,
nada te espante,
todo se pasa,
Dios no se muda;
la paciencia
todo lo alcanza;
quien a Dios tiene
nada le falta:

Sólo Dios basta.
Eleva tu pensamiento,
al cielo sube,
por nada te acongojes,
nada te turbe.

A Jesucristo sigue
con pecho grande,
y, venga lo que venga,
nada te espante.

¿Ves la gloria del mundo?
Es gloria vana;
nada tiene de estable,
todo se pasa.

Aspira a lo celeste,
que siempre dura;
fiel y rico en promesas,
Dios no se muda.

Ámala cual merece
bondad inmensa;
pero no hay amor fino
sin la paciencia.

Confianza y fe viva
mantenga el alma,
que quien cree y espera
todo lo alcanza.

Del infierno acosado
aunque se viere,
burlará sus furores
quien a Dios tiene.

Vénganle desamparos,
cruces, desgracias;
siendo Dios tu tesoro
nada te falta.

Id, pues, bienes del mundo;
id dichas vanas;
aunque todo lo pierda,
sólo Dios basta.

Santa Teresa de Avila, Nada te Turbe

Toma, Señor, y recibe mi libertad,
mi memoria, mi entendimiento y toda mi voluntad,
todo mi haber y mi poseer.

Tú me lo diste, a Ti, Señor, lo torno;
todo es tuyo; dispón de ello conforme a tu voluntad.
Dame tu amor y gracia, que esto me basta.

Santo Ignacio de Loyola, Sucipe (Spiritual Exercises, 234)

In seeking the Kingdom, St. Teresa of Avila said, “sólo Dios basta” and St. Ignatius of Loyola said, “te gracia me basta”. These  reflect what Jesus spoke to Paul in 2 Corinthians 12:9.  As these Spanish mystics of the 16 century have done, we can also attain the state of peace – freedom – the Kingdom, the state of “nada te turbe, nada te espante” – Christian version of what is nirvana in Dharma teaching of Buddhism.  But, we must put the Kingdom as our priority, as Jesus has called us in Matthew 6:33. In seeking the Kingdom first,  St. Ignatius of Loyola cried to God, “Toma, Señor, y recibe mi libertad, mi memoria, mi entendimiento y toda mi voluntad, todo mi haber y mi poseer”.   Mi libertad” is not “verdadera liberta”, because we cannot attain the Kingdom unless our ego is totally surrendered to God through Christ.  And, St. Teresa of Avila was not fooled by “la gloria del mundo”.

When we resolve our ego by totally surrendering it to Christ, there is no longer “mi”, “my”.   We do not have to claim what is ours, because we find our true “self” (kapwa) in Christ, upon crucifying our ego with the flesh of Christ on the Cross.  When we find our kapwa in the risen Christ – finding our true “self” in the true freedom (verdadera liberta de la ansiedad y la angustia), our heart is in peace and can joyfully sing, “sólo Dios basta”….te gracia me basta”.
  
Let us seek Christ and the Kingdom that he has promised, as in him, through his grace, we attain the Kingdom – our true “self” and freedom from anxiety and distress. Our “Purgatorio” is our trials to attain the freedom in the Kingdom, our “Paradiso”, filled with everlasting joy.

                                                                             *****

References:

Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4):709-716.

Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bradshaw,  M. , Ellison,  C. G. , Marcum,  J. P. (2010). Attachment to God, Images of God, and Psychological Distress in a Nationwide Sample of Presbyterians. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20(2): 130–147

Ellison, C.G., Bradshaw, M., Kuyel N., and Marcum, J.P.  (2012). Attachment to God, Stressful Life Events, and Changes in Psychological Distress. Review of Religious Research, 53(4):493-511

Hook, J.N., Worthington,  E.L. , Davis, D.E., Jennings, D.J., Gartner,  A.L., and Hook, J. P. (2010). Empirically supported religious and spiritual therapies. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 66(1):46-72

Koenig, H.G., King, D. E., and Carson, V.B. (2012). Handbook of Religion and Health (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press

Kumar, K.S. & Akoijam, B. S., (2017). Depression, Anxiety and Stress Among Higher Secondary School Students of Imphal, Manipur. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 42(2): 94-96

Muris, P., Meeters, C., and van Asseldonk, M. (2018). Shame on Me! Self-Conscious Emotions and Big Five Personality Traits and Their Relations to Anxiety Disorders Symptoms in Young, Non-Clinical Adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 49(2): 268–278.

Remes, O., Brayne, C., van der Linde, R., and Lafortune, L (2016). A systematic review of reviews on the prevalence of anxiety disorders in adult populations. Brain and Behavior., 6(7), e00497.

Monday, October 8, 2018

If It Is in God's Will, It Will Prevail


The Pharisees challenged Jesus about what’s written in Deuteronomy 24:1-4, asking him, if it is lawful for a man to divorce his wife (Mark 10:2).  While the Pharisees tried to trap Jesus with a “yes-or-no” question, knowing their vicious intent, he never answered their question with neither “yes” nor “no”.  Rather, Jesus responded this way: What did Moses command you?(Mark 10:3). Then, the Pharisees answered, “Moses allowed a man to write a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her” (Mark 10:4), and this is correct. By that time, Jesus was the one with the upper hand and now challenging the Pharisees.  So, Jesus pressed on them, saying, “Because of your hardness of heart he wrote this commandment for you. But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two, but one flesh.  Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate”(Mark 10:5-9), reflecting on Genesis 2:15-25.

This is reflected in the Liturgy of the Word for the 27th Sunday in Ordinary Time on Cycle B and is often cited to explain why the Catholic Church does not permit divorce. If a union between man and woman has to break, then, such a union is not deemed as matrimony, as matrimonial union, which is one of the seven Sacraments in the Catholic Church, is made in accordance with God’s will to conjoin man and woman in one flesh. If a union is truly of God’s will and desire to reflect His covenant love (chesed) for His beloved creation, the humans, such a union should be as steadfast and everlasting as His chesed is (Psalm 136). If a union is not in accordance with God’s will but solely made by human wishes, then, such a union is likely to fizzle. This is a ground for an annulment in the Catholic Church.

What God has joined together, let no one separate”(Mark 10:9; Matthew 19:6).  In fact, this statement of Jesus on the Sacrament of Matrimony is not just about the chesed-like steadfastness of Christian marriage but addressing that no one can alter or even interfere what God intends. In other words, Jesus was addressing that God’s will cannot be tampered by any human will or wishes, and the steadfast matrimonial union is just one example of this truth.

With this in mind, perhaps, we can better understand why both Mark and Matthew put the  episode of Jesus blessing little children (Mark 10:13-16//Matthew 19:13-15), following the episode of Jesus’ argument on marriage against the Pharisee’s challenge (Mark 10:2-12//Matthew 19:3-12). 

Though Mark abruptly shifts the episode of Jesus’ defense of unbreakable union of marriage against Pharisaic challenge to the episode of Jesus blessing of little children, Matthew puts a transition statement, indicating that Jesus moved from Galilee to Judea after arguing with the Pharisees on marriage and divorce (Matthew 19:1-2). Thanks to Matthew, we know that Jesus blessed little children on a different occasion and place from the time and place that he argued with the Pharisees on marriage and divorce on Deuteronomy 14:1-4 and Genesis 2:15-25.

Though Jesus was willing to bless little children, his disciples seemed to have thought that these children were rather nuisance to him, as they tried to prevent the children from being brought to Jesus for blessings. Perhaps, the disciples had thought that they were doing a favor to their master by trying to keep possible annoyance. On the contrary, Jesus was rather indignant about the disciple’s interference to the children from being brought up to him and ordered to bring the children to him (Mark 10:14). This suggests that the disciples’ attempts to prevent the little children from being brought up to Jesus reflects human intention that interferes God’s will, as Jesus’ desire to welcome the children to him reflects God’s will.

Just as a man and a woman brought into one-flesh Sacramental union, called matrimony, by God’s will cannot be separated by any human intentions, little children being brought up to Jesus in accordance with God’s will cannot be prevented from being touched and blessed by Jesus. Thus, both Mark and Matthew address the truth that what is on God’s will cannot be prevented, interfered, and tampered, by any human intentions. Such a challenge against God’s will would be like trying to stop a freight train by jumping into a train track.

Speaking of God’s will to prevail, here is another interesting aspect found in Acts 5.

It was after the Pharisees worked up with other religious authorities and the Roman authority to kill Jesus, after Jesus resurrected and ascended, after the Holy Spirit was poured down on the disciples on Pentecost, as Jesus promised….upon the disciples became the Apostles and began carrying out Jesus’ mission. Obviously, the religious authorities that got rid of Jesus were so annoyed by the Apostles and wanted to kill them, as well. But, they struggled in accomplishing their mission to get rid of the Apostles. So, they consulted a respected Pharisee, a teacher of the Mosaic Law, Gamaliel in terms of what to do with the Apostles. To the religious authorities’ surprise, Gamaliel advised:

Fellow Israelites, consider carefully what you propose to do to these men. For some time ago Theudas rose up, claiming to be somebody, and a number of men, about four hundred, joined him; but he was killed, and all who followed him were dispersed and disappeared. After him Judas the Galilean rose up at the time of the census and got people to follow him; he also perished, and all who followed him were scattered. So in the present case, I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone; because if this plan or this undertaking is of human origin, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them—in that case you may even be found fighting against God!    Acts 5:35-39

Gamaliel was truly a wise teacher, as he called to let God’s will prevail and not to get in the way of God’s will.

Ultimately, it is God’s will and desire to bring all of us to His Kingdom. Including Matrimony, all the Sacraments are visible and tangible outgoing sign of the Holy Spirit to reflect God’s salvlfic will. However, there is always something in our human ego that tries to defy God’s will and interferes with God’s salvific plan. Remember, our ego is easily succumbed to Satan and manipulated by his evil spirit. No wonder Buddhists also strive to attain anatman or anatta, as Shakamuni Buddha had taught problems of ego about 500 years before Jesus.

We need to be as open-hearted as the little Children Jesus was willing to touch and bless so that the Holy Spirit can fill us and seal us, preventing our ego from falling to Satan’s will. This way, we do not become interference to God’s will but rather to become channels of God’s salvific will to prevail, reflecting His chesed to us, while attaining our way of what anatman or anatta by letting our ego crucified with Christ and therefore letting Christ live in us (Galatians 2:20). This way, we, too, may become as humble as St. Francis of Assisi, because the humbler we become, the more effective channels of God’s chesed and everything else in God’s will we become.