Having counseled many sexually assaulted victims, one thing
that always sticks to my mind is that rape victims are re-traumatized when they
were physically examined by physicians for treatment and investigation. Further
re-traumatization occurs as these victims were interviewed by prosecuting
attorney(s) and attorney(s) defending perpetrators.
Imagine what it would be like for a woman, whose sexual part
was violated traumatically, upon being forcibly undressed and her leg tore open
with violent forces, to be put on a physician’s examination seat, being asked
to open her legs – for the sake of necessary medical treatment and obtaining
legal evidence.
As they were put in the examination room, the victims have
to open their legs, shortly after their perpetrators forcibly tore open their
legs. Even for the sake of necessary
medical care and legally required investigation, this procedure is
re-traumatizing, given that it is conducted shortly after the traumatic
assault.
Victims of traumas, including sexual assaults, almost always
experience and exhibit catatonia. They can hardly mobilize their bodies and
body parts. This is particularly so with the parts affected most. But, an examining
physician and assisting nurse(s) constantly ask victims to cooperate medical
procedure and legal investigation by opening legs – when victims’ bodies are
still catatonic.
In order to heal from catatonic effects of trauma, victims
need some time and safe space. However, post-sexual-assault medical and legal
procedure must be conducted as soon as possible to prevent medical
complications, including infection, and to obtain legal evidence for perpetrator
prosecution.
Psychologically, it is better to wait until the victims’
emotional stability is recovered up to a certain level to go through the
medical procedure that requires their legs to be opened again and to have their
sensitive and sacred anatomical part touched by another person. However, in reality, medically and legally,
rape victims are to be examined as soon as possible upon the assaults to
prevent pathophysiological complication and to preserve prosecutor evidence. This is a dilemma in working for healing and
justice for sexually assaulted victims.
As a mental health clinician and pastoral minister, I do all
I can to facilitate the victims’ healing and new psycholospiritual growth,
focusing on their unique inner strengths. For this, I gently guide their attention
to unearth what is not destroyed and lost – whatever sustained the traumatic
assault – to rebuild their personhood anew.
Spiritually and pastorally, I also apply some biblical narratives, such
as the post-exilic restorative narratives, to ignite the victims’ new hope and
strengths, for healing and post-traumatic growth. However, a mental health
clinician, like myself, is not the first helping professional that victims have
to see. They have no choice but to have
a re-traumatizing physical examination by a physician, followed by attorney(s)’s
investigatory interviews. Victims seek
psychological and spiritual care after such re-traumatizing and stressful
procedures are over.
By the time victims seek professional psychological and
spiritual care, they have gone through additional traumas and stress, because
of this frustrating reality.
Though re-traumatizing and highly stressful, these physical
examination, which requires the victims to open catatonic legs, and distressing
investigative interviews are necessary medically and legally. Thus, there is a
dilemma between the psychological -spiritual interests for the victims and the
medical-legal interests for the victims.
Whether you are a physician, or an attorney, or a
psychologist, or a minister, we the helping professionals need to be aware of this
dilemma in engaging our respective tasks for victims of sexual assaults.
In my clinical and pastoral work I provide for victims, it
is important that I acknowledge their most sensitive and sacred anatomical part
was traumatically assaulted and desecrated by the evil forces of the
perpetrators. I also recognize that not only they sustained the horrendous
traumatic sufferings but also re-traumatizing medical procedures and prosecutor
investigations, as they come to me for healing and post-traumatic growth.
In fact, it is critically important that anything associated
to the victims’ strengths are noted not only by the victims themselves but also
by others. Psychologists, ministers,
physicians, nurses, social workers, and attorneys, who get involved in the
victims’ post-assault life in their respective professional capacities, play
important roles in this regard. As other
persons acknowledge the victims’ strengths, it helps them recognize their own
resilient strengths to prompt healing and post-traumatic growth. It will also
help them overcome and transcend victim mentality, which could haunt them for
the rest of their lives.
The victims certainly understand that what is needed to be
done medically and legally must be cone as it should . However, given the inevitable re-traumatizing
nature of this post-assault medically and legally required procedures, it makes
difference if examining physicians and nurses, as well as interviewing
attorneys and social workers, more sensitively acknowledge the victims’ re-traumatization
with their procedures, and conduct more empathically.
Medical and legal procedures should not be mere mechanical
tasks to be done. The procedural tasks must always sensitively and empathically
acknowledge sexually assaulted victims’ traumatization and re-traumatization.
In a way, this is similar to how physicians should tell
their patients “bad news” – shocking, even possibly traumatizing
diagnoses. In this regard, I always
advise physicians and medical students to place themselves in places of their
patients and see how they think their patients would like to hear what they
rather do not want to hear. Telling physicians
to think how they would want to hear if they were the patients is not enough,
because it does not sufficiently acknowledge patients’ unique perspective. Physicians
need to go beyond the sphere of their own perspectives in empathically placing
themselves in patients’ distressed hearts and minds.
Empathy means to enter into the pathos of patients. The
German word, corresponding to empathy in English, is Einfühlung. It literally means to enter (ein) into the feeling (Fühlung), pathos, of the
patient. Another way to understand is to become one (ein) contact (Fühlung), indicating solidarity with the
patient. The latter interpretation is
more closer to Einfühlung’s similar word, Mitfühlung. Thus, whether physicians are examining rape
victims or telling “bad news” to terminally ill patients – whenever physicians
had to perform a task that can shock and (re)traumatize patients – procedures
must genuinely embody the very meaning of empathy or Einfühlung. In other words, treating sexually assaulted
victims must be conducted in a way for clinicians are in solidarity with
victims in the very traumatize hearts and minds of them. This is no easy task at all, as we cannot be
totally free from the sphere of our own personal perspectives. But, this is a very important task that we
constantly strive for – to serve victims more sensitively and compassionately.
We must go beyond our own professional and personal
perspective in dealing with such sensitive clinical issues, whether we are
serving rape victims or terminally ill patients.
I always tell physicians, nurses, attorneys, medical
students, nursing students, and law students, that being a physician, or a nurse,
or an attorney, means being an empathic psychologist first.
Being an empathic psychologist and minister, as well as a
physician and attorney, means simply being compassionate fellow human first,
reflecting the new command (mandatum novum )of Jesus – love your neighbor (John
13:34) as the Good Samaritan did (Luke 10:25-37). Practice this commandment –
not just in our specialized professional capacities, but first and foremost, as
a fellow human being reaching out to victims.
We know professionally that the procedures need to be done
as soon as possible – though we know that the victims are still in trauma. We work under the pressure. However, this is
only our own professional perspective. And,
we need to go beyond this for the sake of empathy – Einfühlung.
Though there is no simple one-fits-all kind of formulate, we
must balance traumatize victims’ perspectives with our professional perspectives
under the pressure by placing our own hearts and minds into the victims’,
because this is the only way we can become genuinely empathic.
For this, we also need to constantly examine and reflect our
own professional perspectives in light of the victims at each case and at each
encounter. In order to accomplish this objective, we must first establish
rapport with them by providing gentle, genuinely compassionate, secure space
and time. Without this, post-assault
medical and legal procedures sure to re-traumatize unnecessarily due to the
empathy deficit on our side.
Though the case may be successfully prosecuted at the
expenses of the victims’ re-traumatization, I do not think that justice, in a true sense, is attained
this way. As a pastoral psychologist, I
continue to address lingering effects of their initial traumas from sexual
assaults but also re-traumatizations brought by the post-assault investigative
medical and legal procedures, lacking the aforementioned empathic sensitivity.
In addition to trauma and re-traumalizations, shame and
guilt, as well as a sense of powerlessness are important factors to be
addressed both psychologically and spiritually, as these factors certainly further
complicate victims’ complicated accumulative traumatizations from
re-traumatizations from medical and legal procedures.
In order to prevent such psychological complications and their
further lingering effects, we really need to take empathy (Einfühlung) more seriously in a way for
us to be in solidarity with victims not in our own perspectives but in their
shattered hearts and minds. This is also
an absolutely necessary condition to prompt post-traumatic growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment